National Brain Health Platform

College Student Cohort Data Catalogue.

A structured English-language catalogue of standardized instruments and thematic questionnaire modules used in the college student cohort. The catalogue is organized by scientific construct rather than by raw spreadsheet columns, allowing collaborators to understand what was measured, when it was measured, and how variables can be interpreted.

WaveWho was assessed, sample scale, linkage status, and deep-phenotyping availability.
DomainMental health, family context, education, sleep, pain, lifestyle, digital behaviour, and other scientific constructs.
InstrumentPurpose, population, item count, response format, scoring, availability, and related variables.

Assessment timeline

Open each collection period to understand what the data represent.

Collection periods are kept distinct whenever sampling, questionnaire content, linkage certainty, or deep-phenotyping availability differs.

BaselineUniversity-entry assessmentOpen
Participants

Newly enrolled college students.

Current sample

32,296 participants in the current public cohort summary.

Questionnaire content

Demographics, family socioeconomic circumstances, pre-university context, academic transition, social resources, lifestyle, sleep, mental health, pain, and somatic health.

Linkage status

Study identifiers support governed linkage to subsequent follow-up waves.

Deep phenotyping

Selected participants contribute SCID, neuroimaging, activity monitoring, sleep physiology, EEG, and biospecimen data.

Follow-up 1Student adaptation and health outcomesOpen
Participants

Students previously enrolled at baseline.

Current sample

10,113 respondents in the current public summary.

Questionnaire content

Repeated core outcomes plus updated academic experience, living conditions, social support, behaviours, developmental residential history, and emerging psychosocial topics.

Linkage status

Longitudinal linkage is available within the governed research dataset; analysis-specific denominators must be reported.

Deep phenotyping

Deep-phenotyping linkage is available for selected subsamples.

Annual programmeNew recruitment and repeated follow-upOpen
Participants

New university entrants and previously enrolled participants.

Current sample

The programme is expected to add more than 10,000 new participants and more than 10,000 participants in each active follow-up wave during the next cycle.

Questionnaire content

A stable longitudinal core is retained while selected modules are updated to address new educational, social, digital, and mental-health concerns.

Linkage status

Linkage follows cohort identifiers and wave-specific quality-control rules.

Deep phenotyping

Additional mechanistic and multimodal assessments can be nested within survey waves.

Instrument and module catalogue

Browse standardized scales and distinctive thematic modules.

Standard instruments and context-specific modules are presented at the same level. This makes family economics, parental migration, bullying, AI use, and educational context visible alongside depression and anxiety scales.

This public catalogue describes questionnaire content and data structure. Item-level wording, response counts, derived-score code, and wave-specific codebooks remain part of the governed research documentation.

Measurement domain

Population and socioeconomic context

3 instruments or thematic modules
Population and socioeconomic contextDemographic and anthropometric profile View details
Construct measured

Age, sex, ethnicity, student status, relationship status, height, weight, and body mass index.

Applicable population

College students

Assessment wave

Baseline and follow-up

Number of items

Multiple single-item variables

Response format

Categorical responses and numeric measurements

Scoring method

Descriptive variables; BMI can be derived from measured or reported height and weight.

Data availability

Available in baseline; selected variables updated at follow-up.

Related variables

Academic programme, residential setting, lifestyle, mental health, and physical health.

Population and socioeconomic contextFamily socioeconomic circumstances View details
Construct measured

Household income, personal expenditure, parental education, parental occupation, sibling structure, parental marital status, and perceived family circumstances.

Applicable population

College students

Assessment wave

Baseline and follow-up

Number of items

Multiple questionnaire items

Response format

Ordered categories, occupational groups, and household composition variables

Scoring method

Variables can be analysed separately or combined into a prespecified socioeconomic index.

Data availability

Core measures available; income and expenditure are updated at follow-up.

Related variables

Pre-university residential history, academic adjustment, social support, depression, anxiety, and sleep.

Population and socioeconomic contextChildhood residential history and parental migration View details
Construct measured

Residential locations across childhood educational stages and prolonged parental employment away from home before age 18.

Applicable population

College students

Assessment wave

Baseline, expanded at follow-up

Number of items

Stage-specific locations plus parental migration duration

Response format

Province/city/county fields and categorical duration responses

Scoring method

Derived indicators may include rural-urban background, geographic mobility, left-behind childhood experience, and duration of parental absence.

Data availability

Detailed developmental residential history is most complete in the follow-up questionnaire.

Related variables

Family relationships, socioeconomic circumstances, social support, resilience, and mental health.

Measurement domain

Education and social environment

3 instruments or thematic modules
Education and social environmentUniversity transition and academic experience View details
Construct measured

Academic discipline, campus residence, satisfaction with major and studies, class ranking, peer relationships, teacher relationships, and university adjustment.

Applicable population

College students

Assessment wave

Baseline and follow-up

Number of items

Multiple single-item and rating-scale measures

Response format

Categorical responses, percentile bands, and 0-10 ratings

Scoring method

Variables are generally retained separately; composite adjustment scores require prespecification.

Data availability

Available across waves with follow-up updates for the previous academic year.

Related variables

Educational stress, school belonging, social support, sleep, depression, and anxiety.

Education and social environmentSocial Support Rating Scale View details
Construct measured

Objective support, perceived support, available support sources, help-seeking, and use of social resources.

Applicable population

College students

Assessment wave

Baseline and follow-up

Number of items

10 items

Response format

Mixed categorical and multiple-response formats

Scoring method

Subscale and total scores can be derived according to the Chinese Social Support Rating Scale manual.

Data availability

Repeated measure in the longitudinal questionnaire system.

Related variables

Family relationships, peer support, resilience, stress, depression, anxiety, and help-seeking.

Education and social environmentCampus climate and belonging View details
Construct measured

Perceived fairness, interpersonal support, school-life experience, social integration, and sense of belonging.

Applicable population

College students

Assessment wave

Baseline and follow-up

Number of items

Multi-item thematic modules

Response format

Likert-type agreement or frequency scales

Scoring method

Module-specific totals or domain scores after psychometric verification.

Data availability

Core school-environment content is retained; selected items may be updated between waves.

Related variables

Academic satisfaction, peer relationships, social support, resilience, and mental health.

Measurement domain

Lifestyle and digital behaviour

4 instruments or thematic modules
Lifestyle and digital behaviourTobacco, e-cigarette, and alcohol use View details
Construct measured

Current and previous smoking, e-cigarette exposure, drinking frequency, quantity, and duration.

Applicable population

College students

Assessment wave

Baseline and follow-up

Number of items

Multiple branching items

Response format

Categorical frequency, quantity, duration, and age-at-initiation responses

Scoring method

Current-use and exposure-history indicators; higher-risk patterns can be defined prospectively.

Data availability

Available across waves; e-cigarette content is included in the updated baseline version.

Related variables

Sleep, physical activity, mental health, pain, and other health behaviours.

Lifestyle and digital behaviourPhysical activity and sedentary behaviour View details
Construct measured

Activity intensity, duration, frequency, walking, strength exercise, sitting time, recreational screen time, and participation in sports groups.

Applicable population

College students

Assessment wave

Baseline and follow-up

Number of items

Activity questionnaire plus detailed sedentary-behaviour items

Response format

Days/week, minutes/day, intensity categories, and participation indicators

Scoring method

Activity volume and sedentary-time variables can be derived; algorithm selection should be documented in the analysis protocol.

Data availability

Available in the survey; objective one-week activity monitoring is available in selected deep-phenotyping subsamples.

Related variables

Actigraphy, sleep timing, BMI, mood, pain, and academic functioning.

Lifestyle and digital behaviourDietary timing and eating habits View details
Construct measured

Breakfast frequency, meal timing, last eating time, and food-frequency indicators.

Applicable population

College students

Assessment wave

Baseline and follow-up

Number of items

Multiple dietary habit and timing items

Response format

Frequency categories and clock-time categories

Scoring method

Individual behaviours or prespecified diet-timing profiles.

Data availability

Available across questionnaire waves with content refinement.

Related variables

Sleep timing, BMI, gastrointestinal symptoms, mood, and daily routine.

Lifestyle and digital behaviourInternet use and problematic digital behaviour View details
Construct measured

Screen exposure, bedtime phone use, post-midnight use, online activity types, loss of control, and functional interference.

Applicable population

College students

Assessment wave

Baseline and follow-up

Number of items

Screen-time items and Internet Addiction Test content

Response format

Time categories and Likert-type frequency responses

Scoring method

Screen-time variables and instrument-based problematic-use scores.

Data availability

Repeated core content; follow-up modules can respond to emerging digital practices.

Related variables

Sleep, academic performance, loneliness, depression, anxiety, and AI-related attitudes.

Measurement domain

Sleep and circadian health

4 instruments or thematic modules
Sleep and circadian healthMunich Chronotype Questionnaire View details
Construct measured

Sleep timing on study/work days and free days, sleep latency, wake time, alarm-clock use, and napping.

Applicable population

College students

Assessment wave

Baseline and follow-up

Number of items

Timing sequence for work/study days and free days

Response format

Clock times, minutes, days/week, and yes/no responses

Scoring method

Sleep duration, midpoint of sleep, social jetlag, and chronotype-related variables.

Data availability

Repeated measure across questionnaire waves.

Related variables

PSQI, insomnia, daytime sleepiness, actigraphy, mood, and digital behaviour.

Sleep and circadian healthPittsburgh Sleep Quality Index View details
Construct measured

Subjective sleep quality, latency, duration, efficiency, disturbances, medication use, and daytime dysfunction.

Applicable population

College students

Assessment wave

Baseline and follow-up

Number of items

19 self-rated items

Response format

Clock times, durations, and 0-3 frequency/severity categories

Scoring method

Seven component scores and a global score using the standard PSQI algorithm.

Data availability

Repeated core sleep measure.

Related variables

Chronotype, insomnia, daytime sleepiness, depression, anxiety, pain, and PSG.

Sleep and circadian healthInsomnia Severity Index View details
Construct measured

Insomnia severity, sleep satisfaction, daytime interference, noticeability, and distress.

Applicable population

College students

Assessment wave

Baseline and follow-up

Number of items

7 items

Response format

Five-point severity ratings

Scoring method

Total score 0-28 using the standard ISI algorithm.

Data availability

Available across waves.

Related variables

PSQI, chronotype, daytime sleepiness, mood, actigraphy, and PSG.

Sleep and circadian healthEpworth Sleepiness Scale View details
Construct measured

Likelihood of dozing in common daytime situations.

Applicable population

College students

Assessment wave

Baseline and follow-up

Number of items

8 items

Response format

Four-point likelihood ratings

Scoring method

Total score 0-24 using the standard ESS method.

Data availability

Available across waves.

Related variables

Sleep duration, insomnia, PSQI, actigraphy, PSG, and academic functioning.

Measurement domain

Mental health and psychological resources

4 instruments or thematic modules
Mental health and psychological resourcesPatient Health Questionnaire-9 View details
Construct measured

Depressive symptoms and associated functional difficulty during the previous two weeks.

Applicable population

College students

Assessment wave

Baseline and follow-up

Number of items

9 symptom items plus functional-impact item where administered

Response format

0-3 frequency scale

Scoring method

Symptom total 0-27; thresholds and item-level interpretation should follow the prespecified protocol.

Data availability

Repeated core mental health outcome.

Related variables

GAD-7, sleep, pain, social support, resilience, self-harm, and clinical interviews.

Mental health and psychological resourcesGeneralized Anxiety Disorder-7 View details
Construct measured

Anxiety symptoms during the previous two weeks.

Applicable population

College students

Assessment wave

Baseline and follow-up

Number of items

7 items

Response format

0-3 frequency scale

Scoring method

Total score 0-21 using the standard GAD-7 algorithm.

Data availability

Repeated core mental health outcome.

Related variables

PHQ-9, stress, sleep, pain, social support, resilience, and clinical interviews.

Mental health and psychological resourcesSelf-harm and suicide-related assessment View details
Construct measured

Non-suicidal self-injury, frequency, methods, medical severity, and suicide-related responses collected through questionnaire branching.

Applicable population

College students

Assessment wave

Baseline and follow-up

Number of items

Branching module; item count depends on responses

Response format

Yes/no, frequency, timing, method, and severity categories

Scoring method

Event indicators and frequency/severity variables; branching rules must be documented in every analysis.

Data availability

Available with wave-specific skip logic.

Related variables

PHQ-9 item 9, depression, anxiety, pain, social support, resilience, and clinical interviews.

Mental health and psychological resourcesResilience and emotion regulation View details
Construct measured

Ability to recover from stress, cognitive emotion-regulation strategies, positive psychological capital, and coping resources.

Applicable population

College students

Assessment wave

Baseline and follow-up

Number of items

Brief Resilience Scale and complementary multi-item modules

Response format

Likert-type agreement or frequency scales

Scoring method

Instrument-specific mean, total, or subscale scores.

Data availability

Available across waves; module composition may vary.

Related variables

Social support, campus climate, academic stress, depression, anxiety, and recovery trajectories.

Measurement domain

Pain, somatic health, and quality of life

3 instruments or thematic modules
Pain, somatic health, and quality of lifePain occurrence, severity, and interference View details
Construct measured

Recurrent or persistent pain, duration, frequency, anatomical location, intensity, treatment, and interference with daily functioning.

Applicable population

College students

Assessment wave

Baseline and follow-up

Number of items

Branching pain module adapted from the Brief Pain Inventory

Response format

Yes/no, duration categories, body locations, 0-10 ratings, and treatment descriptions

Scoring method

Pain presence, number of sites, severity indices, and interference indices.

Data availability

Repeated secondary outcome and somatic-distress measure.

Related variables

PHQ-15, sleep, depression, anxiety, physical activity, gastrointestinal symptoms, and health anxiety.

Pain, somatic health, and quality of lifeSomatic symptoms and health anxiety View details
Construct measured

Common physical symptoms, symptom-related concern, functional interference, and illness-related interpretation.

Applicable population

College students

Assessment wave

Baseline and follow-up

Number of items

PHQ-15 content plus health-anxiety and somatic-concern modules

Response format

Severity/frequency categories and Likert-type agreement scales

Scoring method

Instrument-specific totals and symptom-domain indicators.

Data availability

Available across waves.

Related variables

Pain, gastrointestinal symptoms, sleep, depression, anxiety, healthcare use, and quality of life.

Pain, somatic health, and quality of lifeHealth-related quality of life View details
Construct measured

Mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression, and self-rated health.

Applicable population

College students

Assessment wave

Baseline and follow-up

Number of items

EQ-5D-5L descriptive system plus visual analogue scale where administered

Response format

Five severity levels and 0-100 health rating

Scoring method

Health-state profiles, index values using an appropriate value set, and visual analogue score.

Data availability

Available in the questionnaire framework.

Related variables

Mental health, pain, somatic symptoms, sleep, and functional impairment.

Measurement domain

Emerging social and technological topics

1 instruments or thematic modules
Emerging social and technological topicsDigital mental health and AI acceptability View details
Construct measured

Experience with and willingness to use apps, online platforms, wearables, immersive technologies, and large-language-model-based support.

Applicable population

College students

Assessment wave

Baseline and follow-up; expandable module

Number of items

Multi-item technology and service-acceptability module

Response format

Previous-use indicators, willingness ratings, and preferred-use contexts

Scoring method

Item-level indicators or empirically validated acceptability dimensions.

Data availability

Available and designed for refinement as technology and social concerns evolve.

Related variables

Digital behaviour, help-seeking, service access, mental health, privacy attitudes, and intervention studies.